Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Files

Previews only

The Real T26 "Tanker" M1 Garand (Ad-free)

The name "tanker" has been applied to shortened M1 Garand rifles for a long time and today we are looking at one of the rifle that was the genesis of that concept. It actually has nothing to do with tanks; the idea for a shortened M1 came from the Pacific Warfare Board of the US Army, looking for a handier weapon for jungle fighting. During 1944 when this idea was proposed, Springfield Arsenal was already independently working on the M1E5, a very similar paratrooper version of the M1. The PWB ordered the 6th Infantry Division in the Philippines to make 150 samples for testing, of which two were sent back to Springfield for testing. In testing, the T26 showed the same problems as the M1E5 - excessive recoil, noise, and concussion. Despite this, 15,000 were recommended for production in the summer of 1945, but the war ended before any production actually took place. The name "tanker" came later, when companies started making cut-down Garands for commercial sale and thought that marketing them as specialized tanker weapons would help them sell. http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons http://www.floatplane.com/channel/ForgottenWeapons Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com

Comments

Ryan Thorne

A muzzle device could have mitigated the concussion issue.

Sonny Hughes

I cannot tell you how may disagreements(?) I've had with guys at gun shows back in the day swearing that the "Tanker" M1 they were trying to sell was a legit late WWII issue weapon. Very frustrating. But, as you say, they are really cool!

Scott Gardner

You do get to visit a lot of neat sites, It's a good thing, otherwise we would not see these things.

ViejoLobo

That stock could tell some stories. Note the bullet tip stippling--on the LEFT side.

Guido Schriewer

your "repro" scout tanker ... be very sure I am very jealous about that rifle! yes, that is a wicked cool one.

Terry

“It’s in .308, not 30-06”. Degenerate.

Thomas Batha

You're right of course but then it would have gained back probably 2 of the 6 inches it was shortened by. Would all this be worth a net decrease of only 4 inches?

Thomas Batha

Wonder what happened to the second field modified rifle sent to Washington? You've mentioned 2 of the 3. Does the RIA museum have one?

Donald Davis

30-06 will "blow through" many things aside from jungle brush. Ask my late Uncle Huey, USMC.

Tpatrick

A government program that is largely a duplicate of another government problem..Weird.