Home Creators Posts Import Register Favorites Logout
haven't archived this post yet. have a subscription? use the importer!

Files

Previews only

AR16: Armalite's Lost Battle Rifle (Ad-free)

The best firearms reference books: https://www.headstamppublishing.com The AR-16 was developed in the late 1950s as a less manufacturing intensive option to the AR-10. It began with the AR-12, which was a prototype intended to use a stamped receiver with the Stoner DI gas system. When Armalite sold the AR-15 patents to Colt, they had to revise that design, and it became the AR-14, with a Tokarev type short stroke gas piston and a stamped receiver. Two of these rifles were originally made, both chambered for .308 with folding stocks and mostly stamped parts. They were offered for sale, but there were no buyers - by the time the AR-16 was ready most countries who needed a new rifle had already chosen the FAL, H&K G3, M14, or other option. Instead, when Stoner left Armalite, Arthur Miller scaled the AR-16 down to 5.56mm, where it became the AR-18. Thanks to the Institute of Military Technology for allowing me to have access to these, the only two existing AR-16 examples film for you! Check them out at: http://www.instmiltech.com http://www.patreon.com/ForgottenWeapons http://www.floatplane.com/channel/ForgottenWeapons Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! http://shop.forgottenweapons.com

Comments

Kenneth Marshall

Thank you Ian. I always wanted more information and pics of these.

z c

Its me. I am the market for this.

LigerNoir

Now THAT is a cool rifle! Stoner's designs are always interesting.

Derek Elsberry

Very awesome! For years, I had heard about the AR-16, as the daddy of the AR-18/180. Details were almost non-existent; in that time I found one photo and one technical drawing, and that was it. This post has made my day!

Dana Arbeit

The AR-16, AR-18 and Stoner 63 systems represent high potential that was never realized due to politics/special interests of the time. I vaguely remember reading an article, I believe in the LA Times, back in the 60s, that a DOD study projected that if the Army switched to the AR-18, it would be much cheaper(and better in my opinion). The numbers for mass production were something like $260 per M-16 versus $180 per AR-18(M-17?). The Stoner 63 system would have netted HUGE savings over time and been better weapons. Of course, this is all just my 'not so humble' opinion. One of the "what ifs" of history.

Squid556

Drippy 😎

adam

I remember reading about this in one of Dad's old gun magazines - I think the author was able to shoot it on a new "combat" range at Pendleton? Very cool.

WayneWiiki

bolt handle comes out like a Dunlop guitar strap lock...

Trappes

Ball detent push pins are very common in Aerospace (and fairchild was an aerospace joint). To me it looks like they might have actually modified a commercial pin with a custom sleeve for this, would make sense on a Prototype.

Bruce Brodnax

Doubt the LA Pravda was making a legitimate pitch for better equipment for the men, unless it was some sort of dig at Nixon; even back then, the editorials started on page 1 and nobody w/ any sense took them at their word; more likely a Tribune or Examiner story...